Torres v. Turner
Petitioner: Erby A. Torres
Respondent: Neil Turner
Case Number: 3:2016cv02157
Filed: August 29, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Toledo Office
County: Marion
Presiding Judge: James G. Carr
Presiding Judge: James R. Knepp
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Order: Respondent's motion to dismiss (Doc. 7 ) be, and the same hereby is, granted with prejudice. Petitioner's motion for an evidentiary hearing (Doc. 11 ), be, and the same hereby is, denied as moot. No certificate of appealability will issue, as reasonable judges would agree that the petition is untimely. Judge James G. Carr on 5/2/17.(C,D)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Torres v. Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Erby A. Torres
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Neil Turner
Represented By: Mary Anne Reese
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?