Creagan et al v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. et al
Barry M. Creagan, Jr. and Lauren M. Creagan |
Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Chavan R. Carter, Natex Group, Inc., IGS Trans, Inc. and D&D Commodities Limited |
Chavan R. Carter, D&D Commodities Limited, IGS Trans, Inc. and Natex Group, Inc. |
3:2016cv02788 |
November 16, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Toledo Office |
Erie |
Jeffrey J. Helmick |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 251 Memorandum Opinion and Order: I grant Plaintiffs Barry M. Creagan, Jr., Lauren M. Creagan, Rebecca DeGondea, and L.D., and Defendants Wal-Mart Transportation, LLC and Kirsch Transportation Services, Inc.'s joint motion for an order certif ying my previously-filed Memorandum Opinion and Order and Judgment Entry as a final judgment to permit appeal. (Doc. No. 246). The pending motion for a ruling on this matter is denied as moot. (Doc. No. 250). re 246 250 Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 9/1/2020. (S,AL) |
Filing 224 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Wal-Mart's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 156) and Kirsch's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. No. 183) are granted, as a matter of law. The Creagan Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss affirmative defense (Doc. No. 172) is denied, in turn. Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 12/12/2018. Associated Cases: 3:16-cv-02788-JJH, 3:16-cv-02960-JJH(S,AL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.