Gordon v. Van Schoyck et al
| Dante' D. Gordon |
| Robert Van Schoyck, Patrick M. McGrath, Spectrum Reporting LLC, J. Brunner, P.J. Doran, J. Horton, Maryellen O'Shaugnessy, (FNU) Osborn, (FNU) Ruhl, Dean Mulvain, (FNU) Prichard, Management Training Corp. Medical LLC. and Management Training Corp. |
| 3:2017cv00721 |
| April 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Toledo Office |
| Marion |
| Jeffrey J. Helmick |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
Memorandum Opinion and Order: MTC Defendants are granted judgment on the pleadings of Gordon's First Amendment retaliation and Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement claims and are granted summary judgment of Gordon's Eighth Amen dment deliberate indifference claim. (Doc. Nos. 36 & 59). The motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Magistrate Judge Robert Van Schoyck, Judge Patrick M. McGrath, Judge Jennifer Brunner, Judge Julia Dorrian, and Judge William Klatt is granted. (Do c. No. 53). And the motion for judgment on the pleadings filed by Defendants Director Gary Mohr and Chief Inspector Roger Wilson is granted. (Doc. No. 56). Finally, any claim against Spectrum Reporting LLC is dismissed sua sponte under 28 U.S.C. & #167; 1915(e)(2)(B). Additionally, denied are the following filings by Gordon: motion for a protective order of medical records, (Doc. No. 60); motion to defer consideration of the MTC Defendants' motion, (Doc. No. 61); motion for extension of time to respond to judicial Defendants' motion to dismiss, (Doc. No. 65); motion for leave to amend the complaint, (Doc. No. 67); request for issuance of subpoenas, (Doc. No. 70); motion/objection to my previous order, (Doc. No. 71); motion to c ompel production, (Doc. No. 78); motion to enter default judgment, (Doc. No. 79); and motion for preliminary injunction and physical examination, (Doc. No. 80). Further, all of the MTC Defendants' motions to strike are also denied. (Doc. Nos. 73, 75, & 85). Because no claims remain, the case is closed and MTC Defendants' motion for a decision or conference is denied, as moot. (Doc. No. 90). I certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). re 60 79 59 61 67 73 , 70 90 85 65 75 56 36 53 71 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 2/25/2020. (S,AL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
