Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
Heather Chivon Williams and Heather Williams |
Commissioner of Social Security |
3:2018cv01706 |
July 23, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Toledo Office |
Marion |
Jeffrey J Helmick |
Thomas M Parker |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (M,TL) |
Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet to #1 complaint filed by Heather Chivon Williams. (Herdman, Carol) |
Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Heather Chivon Williams. (Attachments: #1 Financial Information Form)(Herdman, Carol) |
Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fee not paid, IFP, filed by Heather Chivon Williams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Appeals Council denial, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 USM-285) (Herdman, Carol) |
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 07/23/2018. (M,TL) |
Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (M,TL) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (M,TL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.