VanRiper v. General Motors, LLC
Plaintiff: Tammy VanRiper
Defendant: General Motors Company, LLC and General Motors, LLC
Case Number: 3:2018cv01874
Filed: August 14, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Toledo Office
County: Lucas
Presiding Judge: Jack Zouhary
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 12, 2018 Filing 9 Stipulation & Order granting #8 Proposed Stipulation For Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. General Motors, LLC answer due 10/22/2018. Judge Jack Zouhary on 10/12/2018.(D,L)
October 12, 2018 Filing 8 Proposed Stipulation For Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by General Motors, LLC. (Womack, Jocelyn)
October 3, 2018 Notice [non-document]. Initial Phone Status set for 10/24/2018 at 3:00 PM before Judge Jack Zouhary. This Court will initiate the call. (D,L)
September 20, 2018 Filing 7 Marginal Entry Order granting #6 Motion for appearance pro hac vice by Jocelyn L. Womack for General Motors. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. The CM/ECF registration form can be found at www.ohnd.uscourts.gov under Forms. Judge Jack Zouhary on 9/20/2018. (Attachments: #1 ACTL Code of Conduct)(D,L)
September 13, 2018 Filing 6 Motion for attorney Jocelyn L. Womack to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number 0647-8906795, filed by Defendant General Motors, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Affidavit of Jocelyn L. Womack, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing of Jocelyn L. Womack, #3 Proposed Order)(Powers, Allison)
September 7, 2018 Notice to Attorney Jocelyn L. Womack. The Court finds no record of your being admitted to practice in the Northern District of Ohio. Pursuant to LR 83.5, an Application for Admission to Practice or a Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice in this case must be filed within 10 business days. The local rules and the attorney admission application are available on the court's web site at: www.ohnd.uscourts.gov. If you are not the attorney of record in this case, a Motion to Withdraw as Attorney pursuant to LR 83.9 must be filed within 10 business days. Related document(s) #5 . (P,WL)
September 4, 2018 Filing 5 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Tammy VanRiper. General Motors, LLC waiver sent on 8/31/2018, answer due 10/30/2018 filed on behalf of Tammy VanRiper (Bryant, Matthew)
August 15, 2018 Filing 4 Magistrate Consent Form issued. Summons were not provided and were not issued. (M,L)
August 15, 2018 Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a).After Defendant(s) have been served and counsel enter an appearance, this Court will promptly hold an Initial Phone Status Conference. No Motion to Dismiss may be filed in advance of this Conference. The responsive pleading deadline will be automatically tolled until that time. (M,L)
August 15, 2018 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (M,L)
August 15, 2018 Judge Jack Zouhary assigned to case. (M,L)
August 14, 2018 Filing 3 Supplement to Complaint, Supplement - Civil Cover Sheet, filed by All Plaintiffs. Related document(s) #1 , #2 . (Bryant, Matthew)
August 14, 2018 Filing 2 Supplement to Complaint - Exhibit A Right to Sue, filed by All Plaintiffs. Related document(s) #1 . (Bryant, Matthew)
August 14, 2018 Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against General Motors Company, LLC. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-8857986.. Filed by Tammy VanRiper. (Bryant, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: VanRiper v. General Motors, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: General Motors Company, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: General Motors, LLC
Represented By: Allison N. Powers
Represented By: Jocelyn L. Womack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tammy VanRiper
Represented By: Matthew B. Bryant
Represented By: Catherine H. Killam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?