Harsh, Sr. v. Kalida Manufacturing, Inc.
Ronald F. Harsh, Sr. |
Kalida Manufacturing, Inc. and KTH Parts Industries, Inc. |
3:2018cv02239 |
September 28, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Jeffrey J Helmick |
Labor: Fair Standards |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1938 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Stipulation & Order: Defendant shall have 21 days to move or plead in response to the Amended Complaint. Defendant Kalida Mfg need not move or plead in response to the Amended Complaint. Case management conference scheduled for 12/13/18 vacated and rescheduled for 1/8/2019 at 1:00 PM. Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 11/20/2018. (S,AL) |
Filing 13 Amended complaint against All Defendants. Filed by Ronald F. Harsh, Sr. (S,AL) |
Filing 12 Marginal Entry Order granting plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint. (Related Doc #5 ). Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 11/20/2018.(S,AL) |
Filing 11 Joint Proposed Stipulation concerning #5 First Amended Complaint and Defendants' Date to Move or Plead in Response to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for 21 days filed by All Defendants. (Stevens, Janay) |
Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Parent Corporation as H-One Co., Ltd . American Honda Motor Co., Inc., whose ultimate parent is Honda Motor Company, Ltd. Yachiyo Industry Co., Ltd owns a minority interest filed by KTH Parts Industries, Inc.. (Stevens, Janay) |
Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement Kalida Manufacturing is wholly owned by KTH Parts Industries, Inc., (KTH). Controlling Parent is H-One Co., Ltd. Minority interest companies are American Honda Motor Co., Inc., whose ultimate parent is Honda Motor Company, Ltd., and Yachiyo Industry Co., Ltd filed by Kalida Manufacturing, Inc.. (Stevens, Janay) |
Notice by Clerk that Kalida Manufacturing, Inc., and KTH failed to file a corporate disclosure statement as required by Local Rule 3.13(b). (D,TM) |
Filing 8 Attorney Appearance of Allen S. Kinzer and Janay M. Stevens filed by on behalf of Kalida Manufacturing, Inc., KTH Parts Industries, Inc.. (Stevens, Janay) |
Filing 7 Notice of Filing Consent to Join filed by Ronald F. Harsh, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent to Join form - Hinojosa)(Coffman, Matthew) |
Filing 6 Case Management Conference Scheduling Notice: conference to be held on 12/13/2018 at 02:00 PM in Chambers 210 before Judge Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick. (Attachments: #1 Report of Parties Planning Meeting)(S,AL) |
Filing 5 Motion for leave to File First Amended Collective and Class Action Complaint with Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Ronald F. Harsh, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Plaintiff's First Amended Collective and Class Complaint)(Coffman, Matthew) |
Filing 4 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Ronald F. Harsh, Sr. Kalida Manufacturing, Inc., waiver sent on 9/28/18, answer due 11/27/18 filed on behalf of Ronald F. Harsh, Sr (Bryant, Daniel) Modified text-answer dates on 10/25/2018 (D,TM). |
Filing 3 Notice of Filing Consent to Join Form filed by Ronald F. Harsh, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent to Be Party Plaintiff (Harsh))Related document(s) #1 .(Bryant, Daniel) |
Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. No summons provided or issued. (D,TM) |
Filing 1 Collective and Class Action Complaint for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Ohio Law with jury demand against Kalida Manufacturing, Inc.. Filing fee paid $400, Receipt number 0647-8932823.. Filed by Ronald Harsh, Sr.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bryant, Daniel) |
Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (D,TM) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (D,TM) |
Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (D,TM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.