Lewis v. Diversified Consultants, Inc.
Plaintiff: David G. Lewis
Defendant: Diversified Consultants, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2018cv02262
Filed: September 29, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey J Helmick
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2018 Filing 7 Case Management Conference Scheduling Notice: conference to be held on 12/18/2018 at 10:30 AM in Chambers 210 before Judge Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick. (Attachments: #1 Report of Parties Planning Meeting)(S,AL)
October 12, 2018 Filing 6 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by David G. Lewis. Diversified Consultants, Inc. waiver sent on 10/8/2018, answer due 12/7/2018 filed on behalf of David G. Lewis (Volheim, Nathan)
October 1, 2018 Filing 5 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Diversified Consultants, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (M,L)
October 1, 2018 Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (M,L)
October 1, 2018 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (M,L)
October 1, 2018 Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (M,L)
September 29, 2018 Filing 4 Attorney Appearance by Eric D. Coleman filed by on behalf of David G. Lewis. (Coleman, Eric)
September 29, 2018 Filing 3 Attorney Appearance by Taxiarchis Hatzidimitriadis filed by on behalf of David G. Lewis. (Hatzidimitriadis, Taxiarchis)
September 29, 2018 Filing 2 Attorney Appearance by Nathan C. Volheim filed by on behalf of David G. Lewis. (Volheim, Nathan)
September 29, 2018 Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Diversified Consultants, Inc.. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-8934488.. Filed by David G. Lewis. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Volheim, Nathan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lewis v. Diversified Consultants, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David G. Lewis
Represented By: Nathan C. Volheim
Represented By: Eric D. Coleman
Represented By: Taxiarchis Hatzidimitriadis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Diversified Consultants, Inc.
Represented By: Brian D. Roth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?