Pena v. Ohio Department of Mental Health, Northern Ohio Psychiatric Hospital et al
| Mary Novotny Pena |
| Firelands Regional Medical Center, Firelands Counseling and Recovery, Judge William Steuk, Ohio Department of Mental Health, Northern Ohio Psychiatric Hospital, Huron Municipal Police and City of Huron |
| 3:2018cv02369 |
| October 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jack Zouhary |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Judgment Entry: For the reasons set forth in the contemporaneously filed Order of Dismissal, this case is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). Plaintiff's state law claims are dismissed without prejudice. This Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Judge Jack Zouhary on 10/31/2018. (D,L) |
Filing 5
Order of Dismissal. Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis #2 is granted. If Plaintiff desires to pursue future litigation in the Northern District of Ohio, she will be required to pay the full filing fee. Given Plaintiff's filing history, this Court also notes that if she is unhappy with this decision, she should seek redress from the Sixth Circuit. This Court certifies that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3). Judge Jack Zouhary on 10/31/2018. (D,L)
|
| Copy of #5 & #6 mailed to Mary Novotny Pena at P.O. Box 85, Vermilion, OH 44089 on 10/31/2018. (D,L) |
| Filing 4 Supplement to #1 Complaint, Updated list of Plaintiff and Defendants filed by Mary Novotny Pena. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet with Addendum C, #2 Transmittal Letter, #3 Summons, #4 USM-285)(M,L) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/30/2018: #5 Affidavit 10, #6 Affidavit 10 Resume, #7 Affidavit 11, #8 Affidavit 11 Proposal and Suggestions) (M,L). |
| Filing 3 Supplemental Correspondence and Affidavit to #1 Complaint, filed by Mary Novotny Pena. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Affidavit B of Mary Novotny Pena, #2 envelope)(M,L) |
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Mary Novotny Pena. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(M,L) |
| Judge Jack Zouhary assigned to case. (M,L) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (M,L) |
| Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without the filing of a Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a). Without the Civil Cover Sheet, the Clerk does not know if this case is related to or is a refiling of a pending/terminated case in this Court. Copy of #1 Complaint with Civil Cover Sheet, Summons and USM-285 forms mailed to Mary Novotny Pena at P.O. Box 85, Vermilion, OH 44089 on 10/11/2018. Related document(s) #1 . (M,L) Modified to include USM-285 on 10/11/2018 (M,L). |
| Filing 1 Complaint against City of Huron; Firelands Regional Medical Center, Firelands Counseling and Recovery; Huron Municipal Police; Ohio Department of Mental Health, Northern Ohio Psychiatric Hospital; William Steuk. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Mary Novotny Pena. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit A of Ms. Mary Novotny Pena, #2 (Incomplete) Civil Cover Sheet) (M,L) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
