Jones v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
| Edith Jones |
| Lisa Daniels, Whirlpool Corporation and Sarah Lustings |
| 3:2018cv02425 |
| October 19, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jeffrey J Helmick |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Exhibit(s) in support of Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Edith Jones. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Exhibits: Photos, #2 Exhibits: Photos)(D,TM) |
| Filing 3 Supplement to #1 Complaint (Statement of Plaintiff) filed by Edith Jones. (D,TM) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to Edith Jones (pro se) for service upon Whirlpool Corporation. (S,JM) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/19/2018: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (S,JM). |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Lisa Daniels, Sarah Lustings, Whirlpool Corporation. Filing fee paid $400.00. Receipt # 34660010986. Filed by Edith Jones. (Attachments: #1 EEOC Documents, #2 Police Report, #3 Correspondence and Medical Records, #4 Medical Bills, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Summons - Whirlpool Corporation) (S,JM) |
| Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (S,JM) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (S,JM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
