Zehner v. Commissioner of Social Security
Eric Allen Zehner |
Commissioner of Social Security |
3:2018cv02620 |
November 13, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Kathleen B Burke |
James G Carr |
Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Order (non-document) staying case during the government shut down. The stay remains in effect until such time as appropriations funding the federal government are made available. See #General Order 2019-1 for details. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 1/9/2019. (P,G) |
Order (non-document) staying case for a period of 14 days due to the lapse of congressional appropriations funding the federal government. See #General Order 2018-15 for details. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 12/26/2018. (D,TM) |
Filing 6 Second Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Eric Allen Zehner. (Forbes, Randal) |
Order [non-document] re #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Eric Allen Zehner. Plaintiff has filed an improper application to proceed in forma pauperis. He is ordered to complete and submit the entire Financial Application accompanying this Order within 14 days of the date of this Order. Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke on 12/4/2018. (D, I) |
Filing 5 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 11/14/2018. (D,TM) |
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge James G. Carr on 11/14/2018. (D,TM) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke. (D,TM) |
Judge James G. Carr assigned to case. (D,TM) |
Filing 4 Attorney Appearance by Jason S. Rodman filed by on behalf of Eric Allen Zehner. (Rodman, Jason) |
Filing 3 Attorney Appearance by Randal S. Forbes filed by on behalf of Eric Allen Zehner. (Forbes, Randal) |
Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Eric Allen Zehner. (Forbes, Randal) |
Filing 1 Complaint to Review Decision of Commissioner of Social Security Administration against Commissioner of Social Security.. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Eric Allen Zehner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 USM-285) (Forbes, Randal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Zehner v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Eric Allen Zehner | |
Represented By: | Randal S. Forbes |
Represented By: | Jason S. Rodman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | Social Security Administration - Chicago |
Represented By: | Lynne H. Buck |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.