Stacey v. Pullman Company
| Vernon Stacey |
| The Pullman Company d/b/a Tenneco, Tina Bost, Jason Brown, Matt Stringer and Pullman Company |
| 3:2018cv02738 |
| November 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jeffrey J Helmick |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 623 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Return of Service by Clerk unexecuted upon Jason Brown. Service attempted by certified mail on 12/24, 01/01, 1/16/19 filed on behalf of Vernon Stacey. Related document(s) #2 . (R,Ke) |
Filing 7
Order granting #6 Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants Pullman Company and Matt Stringer answer due 2/6/2019. Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 1/8/2019.(SG,D)
|
| Filing 6 Motion for extension of time until February 6, 2019 to Answer filed by Pullman Company, Matt Stringer. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order )(Asmus, Brittany) |
| Filing 5 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Matt Stringer on 12/17/2018, filed on behalf of Vernon Stacey. Related document(s) #2 , #1 . (M,L) |
| Filing 4 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Pullman Company through CT Corporation on 12/24/2018, no delivery date on green card, date obtained from U.S. Postal Service website, filed on behalf of Vernon Stacey. Related document(s) #2 , #1 . (M,L) |
| Filing 3 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Pullman Company on 12/17/2018, filed on behalf of Plaintiffs. Related document(s) #2 , #1 . (D,TM) |
| Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Tina Bost (7017 0660 0000 1511 9938), Jason Brown (7017 0660 0000 1511 9921), Pullman Company (7017 0660 0000 1511 9969) and Pullman Company through their staturory agent, CT Corporation System (7017 0660 0000 1511 9952), Matt Stringer (7017 0660 0000 1511 9945) placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. (M,L) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Tina Bost, Jason Brown, Pullman Company (issued to defendant and statutory agent), Matt Stringer. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (M,L) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (M,L) |
| Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (M,L) |
| Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (M,L) |
| Filing 1 Complaint for Damages and Reinstatement with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-9026125. Filed by Vernon Stacey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons x5, #3 Exhibit A. Right to Sue) (Huntley, Corinne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
