Huguely v. General Motors Company LLC
| Allen J. Huguely |
| General Motors Company LLC and General Motors, LLC |
| 3:2018cv02850 |
| December 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jack Zouhary |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER. Initial Phone Status held on 1/23/2019. After discussion, this Court finds this case is related to Huguely, et al. v. General Motors, LLC, Case No. 3:18 CV 989, pending in this Court. Therefore, the cases will be consolidated, in the interest of judicial efficiency and economy. Any future filings shall be filed in the lead case (Case No. 3:18 CV 989). All deadlines and dates set during the Case Management Conference (Case No. 3:18 CV 989, Doc. 21) are adopted and apply to this case. The Complaint is amended by interlineation in Paragraph 5 #1 to indicate that "Applications had to be submitted by December 14, 2015." Defendant's Answer date is extended until February 25, 2019 (ECF filed in Case No. 3:18 CV 2850). Judge Jack Zouhary on 1/24/2019. (15 mins) (D,L)
|
| NOTICE [non-document] of Initial Phone Status set for 1/23/19 at 10:30 AM before Judge Jack Zouhary. At that time, counsel shall call the District Court conference line. No dispositive motions shall be filed prior to the Initial Phone Status. (S,Na) |
| Filing 5 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Allen J. Huguely. General Motors, LLC waiver sent on 12/12/2018, answer due 2/11/2019 filed on behalf of Allen J. Huguely (Vocht, Michelle) |
| Filing 4 Civil Case Management Procedures Order. Judge Jack Zouhary on 12/12/2018. (D,TM) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Consent Form issued. No summons issued or provided. (D,TM) |
| Filing 2 Supplement to Complaint - Civil Cover Sheet, filed by Allen J. Huguely. Related document(s) #1 . (Vocht, Michelle) |
| Judge Jack Zouhary assigned to case. (D,TM) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (D,TM) |
| Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a).After Defendant(s) have been served and counsel enter an appearance, this Court will promptly hold an Initial Phone Status Conference. No Motion to Dismiss may be filed in advance of this Conference. The responsive pleading deadline will be automatically tolled until that time. (D,TM) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against General Motors LLC. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-9048230. Plaintiff has indicated that case may be related to pending civil action 3:18 CV 989. Filed by Allen J. Huguely. (Vocht, Michelle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
