Amaya v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Octavia Amaya |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 3:2018cv02946 |
| December 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| George J Limbert |
| Jack Zouhary |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Original Summonses, Complaints, and Magistrate Consent Forms issued to U.S. Marshal for service upon Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 USM-285) (S,AA) |
Filing 12
Magistrate Judge's Initial Order: Defendant is to file a certified copy of the transcript of the administrative proceedings and answer within 60 days from the date of service of the complaint; within 30 days of the filing of the transcript and answer, plaintiff must file a brief; within 30 days of the filing of plaintiff's brief, defendant may file a brief in support of the Commissioner's decision; if plaintiff chooses to respond to defendant's brief, plaintiff shall file a reply brief within 14 days from the filing of defendant's brief; further, plaintiff's counsel shall immediately fax or email the U.S. Attorney's Office, Northern District of Ohio, the case name, case number, and plaintiff's social security number, and shall file a certificate, confirming that such notice has been sent. Signed by Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert on 2/11/2019. (S,AA)
|
| Filing 11 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (S,AA) |
|
Filing 10
Order: granting plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert on 2/7/2019.(S,AA)
|
|
Order [non-document]: granting motion of plaintiff for appearance pro hac vice by Attorney Daryl Royal; Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. The CM/ECF registration form can be found at www.ohnd.uscourts.gov under Forms. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. (Related Doc #3 ). Approved by Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert on 2/7/2019.(S,AA)
|
| Filing 9 Praecipe for issuance of Original Summons filed by Octavia Amaya. Related document(s) #8 . (Royal, Daryl) |
|
Order (non-document) staying case during the government shut down. The stay remains in effect until such time as appropriations funding the federal government are made available. See #General Order 2019-1 for details. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 1/9/19. (S,AA)
|
| Filing 8 Proposed Summons & Marshal Form, filed by Octavia Amaya. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 USM-285 Marshal Form)(Royal, Daryl) Modified text on 1/17/2019 (R,Ke). |
| Filing 7 Notice: Certificate of Service (SSN), filed by Octavia Amaya. (Royal, Daryl) Modified text on 1/17/2019 (R,Ke). |
|
Order (non-document) staying case for a period of 14 days, due to the lapse of congressional appropriations funding the federal government. See #General Order 2018-15 for details. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 12/26/2018. (H,SN)
|
| Filing 6 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 12/21/18. (D,TM) |
| Filing 5 Supplement - Civil Cover Sheet, filed by Octavia Amaya. (Royal, Daryl) |
| Filing 4 Errata Correcting Proposed Order filed by Octavia Amaya. Related document(s) #3 . (Royal, Daryl) |
| Filing 3 Motion for attorney Daryl Royal to Appear Pro Hac Vice with memorandum in support and proposed order. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number 0647-9065665, filed by Plaintiff Octavia Amaya. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Royal, Daryl) Modified, proposed order contains incorrect name on 12/21/2018 (O,K). |
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Octavia Amaya. (Royal, Daryl) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fee not paid, IFP pending. Filed by Octavia Amaya. (Royal, Daryl) |
| Judge Jack Zouhary assigned to case. (D,TM) |
| Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert pursuant to Local Rule 72.2.. Judge Jack Zouhary on 12/21/2018. (D,TM) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert. (D,TM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Amaya v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Octavia Amaya | |
| Represented By: | Daryl C. Royal |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration - Chicago |
| Represented By: | Ruchi Vikram Asher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
