Evanoff vs Stenger & Stenger PC
| Martha Evanoff |
| Stenger & Stenger PC |
| 3:2019cv00124 |
| January 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jack Zouhary |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Order of Case Dismissal approving #4 Notice of Dismissal Under FRCP 41(a)(1). Judge Jack Zouhary on 1/30/2019. (D,L)
|
| Filing 4 Notice of Dismissal Under FRCP 41(a)(1) filed by Martha Evanoff. (Murray, John) |
| Filing 3 Civil Case Management Procedures Order. Judge Jack Zouhary on 1/17/2019. (D,TM) |
| Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. Service by Waiver. (D,TM) Modified to note waiver on 1/26/2019 (M,L). |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Defendant Stenger & Stenger, PC. Filing fee paid $400, Receipt number 0647-9100750. Filed by Martha Evanoff. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Waiver of Service) (Murray, John) Modified text on 1/17/2019 (D,TM). |
| Judge Jack Zouhary assigned to case. (D,TM) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (D,TM) |
| Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a).After Defendant(s) have been served and counsel enter an appearance, this Court will promptly hold an Initial Phone Status Conference. No Motion to Dismiss may be filed in advance of this Conference. The responsive pleading deadline will be automatically tolled until that time. (D,TM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Evanoff vs Stenger & Stenger PC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Stenger & Stenger PC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Martha Evanoff | |
| Represented By: | John T. Murray |
| Represented By: | Leslie O. Murray |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
