Cann v. Denn-Ohio, LLC
| Angelena Cann |
| Denn-Ohio, LLC |
| 3:2019cv00300 |
| February 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jeffrey J Helmick |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Order of Case Dismissal. This Court hereby accepts and approves the proposed settlement and holds that the proposed settlement submitted by the parties is a fair and reasonable settlement of a bona fide dispute over the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act.The above case is hereby dismissed, with prejudice, each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. re #4 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 3/27/2019. (R,Ke)
|
| Filing 4 Joint Motion for Approval of Confidential Settlement and for Dismissal with Prejudice filed by Defendant Denn-Ohio, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kelly, Brian) |
| Filing 3 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Angelena Cann. Denn-Ohio, LLC waiver sent on 2/8/2019, answer due 4/9/2019 filed on behalf of Angelena Cann (Simon, James) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons issued to counsel for service upon Denn-Ohio, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (D,TM) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Denn-Ohio, LLC. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-9138467. Plaintiff has indicated that case may be related to pending civil action 3:19-cv-00280. Filed by Angelena Cann. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Simon, James) |
| Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (D,TM) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (D,TM) |
| Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (D,TM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cann v. Denn-Ohio, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Denn-Ohio, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Brian J. Kelly |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Angelena Cann | |
| Represented By: | James L. Simon |
| Represented By: | Christopher J. Bendau |
| Represented By: | Clifford P. Bendau, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
