Emerson v. Hebb
| Joseph Emerson |
| Joseph Hebb |
| 3:2019cv00460 |
| March 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James G Carr |
| Taxes |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Copy of #8 Judgment, #7 Order, mailed to Joseph Emerson, PO Box 13, Toledo, OH 43601 on 4/1/19. Related document(s) #8 , #7 . (C,D) |
| Filing 8 Judgment: This action (Doc. #1 ) be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. I hereby certify, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision would not be in good faith and shall not be allowed without prepayment of the filing fee. (re #7 Order). Judge James G. Carr on 3/28/19. (C,D) |
Filing 7
Order: This action (Doc. #1 ) be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. I hereby certify, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision would not be in good faith and shall not be allowed without prepayment of the filing fee. Judge James G. Carr on 3/28/19. (C,D)
|
| Filing 6 Supplement to #1 Complaint filed by Joseph Emerson on 3/19/2019. (B,JL) |
| Filing 5 Civil Cover Sheet (partially completed) filed by Joseph Emerson. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(M,L) |
| Filing 4 Supplement to #1 Complaint, filed by Joseph Emerson. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(M,L) |
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet to #1 Complaint, filed by Joseph Emerson. (No 2nd page, filer previously notified) Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Addition to Case-Face Page of Complaint, #2 Envelope)(D,TM) |
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Joseph Emerson. (R,Ke) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Joseph Hebb. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Joseph Emerson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit: IRS correspondence and tax returns, #2 Exhibit: IRS correspondence and tax returns, redacted, #3 Summons, #4 USM-285) (R,Ke) |
| Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without the filing of a Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a). Without the Civil Cover Sheet, the Clerk does not know if this case is related to or is a refiling of a pending/terminated case in this Court. Copy of #1 Complaint and blank Civil Cover Sheet mailed to Joseph Emerson at P.O. Box 13, Toledo, Ohio 43601 on 3/1/2019. (R,Ke) |
| Judge James G. Carr assigned to case. (R,Ke) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (R,Ke) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Emerson v. Hebb | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Joseph Hebb | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joseph Emerson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
