United States of America, et al. v. City of Toledo
Plaintiff: State of Ohio and United States of America
Defendant: City of Toledo
Case Number: 3:2019cv00601
Filed: March 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: James G Carr
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 9607
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2019 Filing 3 Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Pending Solicitation of Public Comments by the Department of Justice filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Consent Decree, #2 Appendix A, Map of Ottawa River Assessment Area, #3 Appendix B, Statement of Work, #4 Appendix C, Final Restoration Plan and Environmental Assessment, #5 Appendix D, Cooperative Management Agreement, #6 Appendix E, Manhattan Marsh List of Properties, #7 Appendix F, Environmental Covenant, #8 Appendix G, Agreement between Metroparks and City of Toledo, #9 Appendix H, Depiction of Dike Property)(Ellis, Steven)
March 18, 2019 Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. No summons issued or provided. (D,TM)
March 18, 2019 Filing 1 Complaint for Natural resource damages against City of Toledo. Filing fee exempt Plaintiff has indicated that case may be related to pending civil action 3:16-2022. Filed by United States of America, et al. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Ellis, Steven)
March 18, 2019 Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (D,TM)
March 18, 2019 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (D,TM)
March 18, 2019 Judge James G. Carr assigned to case. (D,TM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America, et al. v. City of Toledo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: State of Ohio
Represented By: Timothy J. Kern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Steven D. Ellis
Represented By: Steven J. Paffilas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Toledo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?