Hairston v. Pettiway et al
Plaintiff: Rico Isaih Hairston
Defendant: Manichan, Bias and Pettiway
Case Number: 3:2019cv01042
Filed: May 9, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey J Helmick
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Amended complaint to add claim of 1st amendment retaliation and 4th amendment search and seizure against All Defendants. Filed by Rico Isaih Hairston. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Declaration, #2 Envelope) (D,TM)
May 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Supplement to #1 Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet, filed by Rico Isaih Hairston. Related case number 3:19cv37. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (K,AR)
May 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without the filing of a Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a). Without the Civil Cover Sheet, the Clerk does not know if this case is related to or is a refiling of a pending/terminated case in this Court. Copy of the #1 Complaint, and a blank Civil Cover Sheet mailed to Rico Hairston 741324 Toledo Correctional Institution 2001 East Central Avenue, Toledo, OH 43608. Related document(s) #1 . (K,AR)
May 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (redacted) filed by Plaintiff Rico Isaih Hairston. (Attachments: #1 IFP unredacted, #2 Cashier Statement)(K,AR)
May 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Bias, Manichan, Pettiway. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Rico Isaih Hairston. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Correspondence, #2 Exhibit B-L Deposition Corrections, #3 Exhibit A1 - Correspondence, #4 Exhibit Franklin County Reply Brief, #5 Exhibit H-1 Correspondence, #6 Civil Cover Sheet (Incomplete), #7 Summons, #8 USM-285) (K,AR)
May 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (K,AR)
May 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (K,AR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hairston v. Pettiway et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rico Isaih Hairston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Manichan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bias
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pettiway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?