Hych v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Katrina M Hych |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 3:2019cv01086 |
| May 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| William H Baughman |
| Jack Zouhary |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Return of Service by U.S. Marshal by personal service executed upon Commissioner of Social Security via U.S. Attorney on 5/31/2019; upon U.S. Attorney General via FedEx on 6/10/2019; upon Office of Regional Chief Counsel via FedEx on 6/10/2019 filed on behalf of Katrina M Hych Related document(s) #1 , #6 . (S,KM) |
| Filing 7 Attorney Appearance by John R. Polofka filed by on behalf of Katrina M Hych. (Polofka, John) |
| Filing 6 Original Summons issued to U. S. Marshal for service upon Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 USM-285) (D,Ky) |
Filing 5
Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr., on 5/21/19. (D,Ky)
|
|
Filing 4
Order granting plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr., on 5/21/19.(D,Ky)
|
| Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (R,Ke) |
| Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Jack Zouhary on 5/15/2019. (R,Ke) |
| Judge Jack Zouhary assigned to case. (R,Ke) |
| Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. (R,Ke) |
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Katrina M Hych. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Chermol, David) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fee not paid, IFP Plaintiff has indicated that case may be a refiling of a previously remanded case 3:16-cv-02658-WHB. Filed by Katrina M Hych. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons for Service on United States Attorney's Office, OHND, #3 Summons for Service on Attorney General of USA, DOJ, #4 Summons for Service on Office of Regional Chief Counsel, Region V, SSA) (Chermol, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hych v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Katrina M Hych | |
| Represented By: | David F. Chermol |
| Represented By: | John R. Polofka |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Ruchi Vikram Asher |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration - Chicago |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
