Brint Electric Inc. v. Syncreon America, Inc.
Plaintiff: Brint Electric Inc and Brint Electric Inc.
Defendant: Syncreon America, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2019cv01234
Filed: May 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: James G Carr
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 24, 2019 Filing 12 Motion to dismiss and , Motion to change/transfer venue with Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Syncreon America, Inc.. (Mancuso, Sarah)
July 10, 2019 Filing 11 Proposed Order as to pro hac vice filed by Syncreon America, Inc. Related document(s) #10 . (Mancuso, Sarah) Modified on 7/18/2019 (M,L).
July 10, 2019 Filing 10 Motion for attorney Mark W. Steiner to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number 0647-9407381, with affidavit and pro hac registration certificate filed by Defendant Syncreon America, Inc.. (Mancuso, Sarah)
June 19, 2019 Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Syncreon America, Inc.. (Mancuso, Sarah)
June 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer; Syncreon America, Inc. answer due 7/24/2019. Judge James G. Carr on 6/19/19.(C,D)
June 18, 2019 Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Brint Electric Inc.. (Trimble, J.)
June 18, 2019 Notice by Clerk that Syncreon America, Inc. failed to file a corporate disclosure statement as required by Local Rule 3.13(b). (R,Ke)
June 18, 2019 Notice by Clerk that Brint Electric Inc. failed to file a corporate disclosure statement as required by Local Rule 3.13(b). (R,Ke)
June 12, 2019 Filing 7 Motion for extension of time until 07/24/2019 to answer #1 Complaint filed by Defendant Syncreon America, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order )(Mancuso, Sarah)
June 12, 2019 Filing 6 Attorney Appearance by Sarah Mancuso filed on behalf of Syncreon America, Inc. (Mancuso, Sarah) Modified text on 6/18/2019 (R,Ke).
June 11, 2019 Filing 5 Return of Service by certified mail executed upon Syncreon America, Inc. on 6/5/2019, filed on behalf of Brint Electric Inc. (Trimble, J.) Related documents #1 , #2 . Modified on 6/26/2019: First page of Summons does not contain Court seal and signature. (M,L).
June 6, 2019 Filing 4 Return of Service by certified mail executed upon Syncreon America, Inc. on 6/3/2019, no delivery date on green card, date obtained from U.S. Postal Service website, filed on behalf of Brint Electric Inc. (Trimble, J.) Modified text to correct service date on 6/14/2019. Answer date updated. (M,L).
June 6, 2019 Filing 3 FILING ERROR: Return of Service by certified mail executed upon Syncreon America, Inc. on 6/3/2019, filed on behalf of Brint Electric Inc. (Trimble, J.) Modified on 6/6/2019: Incomplete document. Filer notified and will refile with Proof of Service. (M,L).
May 30, 2019 Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Syncreon America, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (K,AR)
May 30, 2019 Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Syncreon America, Inc.. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-9336786.. Filed by Brint Electric Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Auburn Hills, MI, #3 Summons Lansing, MI, #4 Exhibit 1 Quote, #5 Exhibit 2-emails, #6 Exhibit 3-invoice) (Trimble, J.)
May 30, 2019 Judge James G. Carr assigned to case. (K,AR)
May 30, 2019 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (K,AR)
May 30, 2019 Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (K,AR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brint Electric Inc. v. Syncreon America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brint Electric Inc
Represented By: Matthew J. Rohrbacher
Represented By: J. Mark Trimble
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brint Electric Inc.
Represented By: Matthew J. Rohrbacher
Represented By: J. Mark Trimble
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Syncreon America, Inc.
Represented By: Sarah M. Mancuso
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?