Moore v. Dewiltz et al
Antoine Maurice Moore |
Adult Parol Authority, Jason Raynor, Lucas County Sheriff Department, Jill Dewiltz and Adult Parole Authority |
3:2019cv01329 |
June 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Jack Zouhary |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Amended Complaint against Adult Parole Authority, Jill Dewiltz, Lucas County Sheriff Department, Jason Raynor filed by Antoine Maurice Moore. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1. Corrections Officer Report, #2 Exhibit 2. Copy of Original Complaint, #3 Envelopes) (S,KM) |
Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Antoine Maurice Moore. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Statement)(Y,A) |
Filing 1 Complaint against Adult Parol Authority, Jill Dewiltz, Lucas County Sheriff Department, Jason Raynor. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Plaintiff has indicated that case may be related to pending civil action 3:19-CV-00168. Filed by Antoine Maurice Moore. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Lucas County Docket/Memo, #3 Letter, #4 Summons, #5 USM-285) (Y,A) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (Y,A) |
Judge Jack Zouhary assigned to case, (Y,A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.