Pitzen v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
| Marsha A. Pitzen |
| Commissioner of the Social Security Administration |
| 3:2019cv01523 |
| July 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jeffrey J Helmick |
| David A Ruiz |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Return of Service by U.S. Marshal by personal service executed upon Commissioner of the Social Security Administration c/o US Attorney's Office on 7/15/19, upon US Attorney General's Office via FedEx on 7/18/19, upon Office of Regional Chief Counsel via FedEx on 7/19/19 filed on behalf of Marsha A. Pitzen(Related document(s) #5 ). (H,SP) |
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz on 7/12/2019. (G,CA) |
| Filing 5 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to U.S. Marshal for service upon Commissioner of the Social Security Administration c/o the U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney General and Office of Regional Chief Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (G,CA) |
Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz on 7/12/2019.(G,CA)
|
| Filing 4 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 7/3/2019. (K,AR) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Providing Information to US Attorney filed by Marsha A. Pitzen. (Farrell, Clifford) |
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Marsha A. Pitzen. (Farrell, Clifford) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of the Social Security Administration.. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Marsha A. Pitzen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 USM-285 Attorney General, #3 USM-285 US Attorney, #4 USM-285 Regional Counsel, #5 Summons Attorney General, #6 Summons US Attorney, #7 Summons Regional Counsel) (Farrell, Clifford) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz. (K,AR) |
| Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 7/3/2019. (K,AR) |
| Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (K,AR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pitzen v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Marsha A. Pitzen | |
| Represented By: | Clifford M. Farrell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Lisa Johnson |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration - Chicago |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
