Armstrong v. Ventra Sandusky, LLC
| Maurice Armstrong |
| Ventra Sandusky, LLC |
| 3:2019cv02401 |
| October 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jeffrey J Helmick |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Order of Case Management Conference held on 11/20/2019. Case is assigned to the standard track. Time: 10 minutes. Discovery due by 5/29/2020. Parties to be Joined and Pleading Amendments due by 1/3/2020. Telephone Conference set for 4/21/2020 at 11:00 AM before Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick. The Court will initiate the phone call. Demand to be served by the beginning of April; Defendants to respond prior to the scheduled conference. Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 11/22/2019. (S,AL)
|
| Filing 8 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting - parties do not consent to this case being assigned to the magistrate judge, filed by Ventra Sandusky, LLC. Related document(s) #6 .(Gibney, Thomas) |
| Filing 7 Answer to Complaint (Related Doc #1 ) filed by Ventra Sandusky, LLC. (Gibney, Thomas) |
| Filing 6 Case Management Conference Scheduling Notice: conference to be held on 11/20/2019 at 08:30 AM in Chambers 210 before Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick. (Attachments: #1 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting)(S,AL) |
|
Order [non-document] granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer: Ventra Sandusky, LLC answer due 11/12/2019. Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 10/22/2019.(S,AL)
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until November 12, 2019 to answer plaintiff's complaint filed by Defendant Ventra Sandusky, LLC. Related document(s) #1 . (Gibney, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (R,Ke) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Ventra Sandusky, LLC. (Gibney, Thomas) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet filed by Ventra Sandusky, LLC. Related document(s) #1 .(Gibney, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Erie County Common Pleas, case number 2019-CV-0507 with jury demand, Filing fee paid $ 400, receipt number 0647-9574330.. Filed by Ventra Sandusky, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Complaint with Summons, #2 Affidavit of Catherine Cupal) (Gibney, Thomas) |
| Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (R,Ke) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (R,Ke) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Armstrong v. Ventra Sandusky, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ventra Sandusky, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Carrie L. Urrutia |
| Represented By: | Thomas J. Gibney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Maurice Armstrong | |
| Represented By: | Leslie O. Murray |
| Represented By: | John T. Murray |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
