Hunt v. Digital Consulting Services/Sustainment and Restoration Services et al
| Carla Orvis Hunt |
| Digital Consulting Services/Sustainment and Restoration Services, Naval Postgraduate School, David Smarsh and Sandra Leavitt |
| 3:2020cv00075 |
| January 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jeffrey J Helmick |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Motion for appointment of counsel (Affidavit of Need) filed by Plaintiff Carla Orvis Hunt. (M,L) |
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Carla Orvis Hunt. (Attachments: #1 Financial Information)(M,L) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/14/2020: #2 Motion with file-stamp) (M,L). |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Digital Consulting Services/Sustainment and Restoration Services, Sandra Leavitt, Naval Postgraduate School, David Smarsh. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Carla Orvis Hunt. (Attachments: #1 EEOC Charge of Discrimination, #2 EEOC Dismissal and Notice of Rights, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons, #5 USM-285) (M,L) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (M,L) |
| Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (M,L) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
