Sturgil v. Lazer Spot, Inc.
Summer Sturgil |
Lazer Spot, Inc. |
3:2020cv00147 |
January 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
James G Carr |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2661 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Order of Case Dismissal with prejudice. Judge James G. Carr on 3/14/2020. (D,TM) |
Filing 6 Unopposed Motion to dismiss case with prejudice filed by Plaintiff Summer Sturgil. (Hymore, Ryan) |
Filing 5 Default Entered on 3/10/2020 against Lazer Spot, Inc. Sandy Opacich, Clerk by Tina M. Damoah, Deputy Clerk. Related Document #4 . (D,TM) |
Copy of #5 Default Entered mailed to Lazer Spot, Inc. at Ste. 1330, 50 W. Broad Street, Columbus, OH 43215 on 3/10/2020. (D,TM) |
Filing 4 Application to Clerk for entry of default against Lazer Spot, Inc. filed by Summer Sturgil. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1: Declaration of Ryan K. Hymore)(Hymore, Ryan) |
Filing 3 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Lazer Spot, Inc. on 1/27/2020, filed on behalf of Summer Sturgil. Related document(s) #2 . (R,Ke) |
Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Lazer Spot, Inc. placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 7019 1640 0001 4540 3144. (M,L) |
Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Lazer Spot, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (M,L) |
Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Lazer Spot, Inc.. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-9737686.. Filed by Summer Sturgil. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Hymore, Ryan) |
Judge James G. Carr assigned to case. (M,L) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (M,L) |
Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (M,L) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sturgil v. Lazer Spot, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Summer Sturgil | |
Represented By: | Ryan K. Hymore |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Lazer Spot, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.