McMurran v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
| Carol McMurran and Willis McMurran |
| National Railroad Passenger Corporation |
| 3:2020cv00338 |
| February 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jack Zouhary |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Civil Case Management Procedures Order. Judge Jack Zouhary on 2/14/2020. (R,Ke) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (R,Ke) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by National Railroad Passenger Corporation dba AMTRAK. (Kirkham, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Lucas County Common Pleas Court, case number G-4801-CI-0201904724-000 Filing fee paid $ 400, receipt number AOHNDC-9796953. Filed by National Railroad Passenger Corporation . (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - 49 USC 24301, #3 Exhibit B - Service of Legal Documents, #4 Exhibit C - Certified Mail, #5 Exhibit D - Email conversation, #6 Exhibit E - Complaint, #7 Exhibit F - Summons) (Kirkham, Thomas - s/Richard F. Ellenberger) Modified signer on 2/14/2020 (R,Ke). |
| Judge Jack Zouhary assigned to case. (R,Ke) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (R,Ke) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
