Benchmark Construction Co., Inc. et al v. City of Lima, Ohio
MG Underground LLC and Benchmark Construction Co., Inc. |
City of Lima, Ohio |
3:2020cv01077 |
May 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Jack Zouhary |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Civil Case Management Procedures Order. Judge Jack Zouhary on 5/18/2020. (M,L) |
Filing 7 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon City of Lima, Ohio. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (M,L) |
Filing 6 Supplement to Complaint, - Summons, filed by All Plaintiffs. Related document(s) #1 . (Liggett, Luther) |
Filing 5 FILING ERROR: Documents appear blank. To be refiled. Supplement to Complaint, - Summons, filed by All Plaintiffs. Related document(s) #1 . (Liggett, Luther) Modified on 5/18/2020 (M,L). |
Filing 4 Supplement to Complaint, - Civil Cover Sheet, filed by All Plaintiffs. Related document(s) #1 . (Liggett, Luther) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by MG Underground LLC. (Liggett, Luther) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Benchmark Construction Co., Inc.. (Liggett, Luther) |
Filing 1 Complaint for Money Damages against City of Lima, Ohio. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number AOHNDC-9982350. Filed by Benchmark Construction Co., Inc., MG Underground LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons (Summons are blank. To be refiled.), #3 Pleading Corporate Disclosure, #4 Pleading Corporate Disclosure) (Liggett, Luther) Modified text on 5/18/2020: Corporate disclosures refiled using correct event. (M,L). |
Judge Jack Zouhary assigned to case. (M,L) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (M,L) |
Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a).After Defendant(s) have been served and counsel enter an appearance, this Court will promptly hold an Initial Phone Status Conference. No Motion to Dismiss may be filed in advance of this Conference. The responsive pleading deadline will be automatically tolled until that time. (M,L) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.