Mills et al v. FIS 2 LLC et al
| Matthew David Mills, Johnathan Robert Mills, Ronald S. Mills, Daniel Steven Mills and Judy A. Mills |
| Fort Industry Square, LLC, ProMedica Health System, Inc., John Does, Buildtech Ltd. Construction Development, Midland Agency of Northwest Ohio, Inc., Karp and Associates LLC, Louisville Title Agency for N.W. Ohio, Inc. and FIS 2 LLC |
| 3:2020cv01141 |
| May 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jeffrey J Helmick |
| Torts to Land |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Buildtech Ltd. Construction Development, FIS 2 LLC, Fort Industry Square, LLC, Karp and Associates LLC, Louisville Title Agency for N.W. Ohio, Inc., ProMedica Health System, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (M,L)
|
|
Filing 4
Supplement to Complaint - Summons to Defendants, filed by All Plaintiffs. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Summons to FIS, #2 Summons to FIS 2, #3 Summons to Karp, #4 Summons to Louisville, #5 Summons to Midland(Incorrect document uploaded. To be refiled. Filer notified.), #6 Summons to ProMedica)(Miller, Robert) Modified text on 5/26/2020 (M,L).
|
|
Filing 3
Supplement to Complaint,,, - Civil Cover Sheet, filed by All Plaintiffs. Related document(s) #1 . (Miller, Robert)
|
|
Filing 2
Motion for temporary restraining order and Preliminary Injunction filed by Daniel Steven Mills, Johnathan Robert Mills, Judy A Mills, Matthew David Mills, Ronald S Mills. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting TRO, #2 Certificate of Notice)(Miller, Robert)
|
|
Filing 1
Verified Complaint with jury demand against Buildtech Ltd. Construction Development, John Does, FIS 2 LLC, Fort Industry Square, LLC, Karp and Associates LLC, Louisville Title Agency for N.W. Ohio, Inc., Midland Agency of Northwest Ohio, Inc., ProMedica Health ystem, Inc. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number AOHNDC-9998894. Filed by Johnathan Robert Mills, Judy A. Mills, Matthew David Mills, Ronald S. Mills, Daniel Steven Mills. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-F to Verified Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons to Buildtech, #4 Summons to FIS, #5 Summons to FIS 2, #6 Summons to Karp, #7 Summons to Louisville, #8 Summons to Midland, #9 Summons to ProMedica) (Miller, Robert)
|
|
Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (M,L)
|
|
Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (M,L)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (M,L)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
