Liggons v. General Motors, LLC et al
| Shawn Liggons |
| Local 14, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America and General Motors, LLC |
| 3:2020cv01208 |
| June 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jeffrey J Helmick |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Local 14, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America. (Torzewski, Joan)
|
|
Filing 10
Answer to #1 Complaint, filed by Local 14, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America. (Torzewski, Joan)
|
|
Filing 9
Attorney Appearance by Joan Torzewski filed by on behalf of Local 14, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America. (Torzewski, Joan)
|
|
Filing 8
Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Shawn Liggons. Local 14, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America waiver sent on 6/3/2020, answer due 8/3/2020 filed on behalf of Shawn Liggons (Landry, Francis)
|
|
Filing 7
Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Shawn Liggons. General Motors, LLC waiver sent on 6/3/2020, answer due 8/3/2020 filed on behalf of Shawn Liggons (Landry, Francis)
|
|
Filing 6
Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent General Motors Company, Corporate Parent General Motor Holdings, LLC for General Motors, LLC filed by General Motors, LLC. (Toth, K.)
|
|
Filing 5
Attorney Appearance by K. Ellen Toth and Federico G. Barrera filed by on behalf of General Motors, LLC. (Toth, K.)
|
|
Filing 4
Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons--directed to Defendant UAW Local 14 filed by Shawn Liggons. (Landry, Francis)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons (directed to General Motors, LLC) filed by Shawn Liggons. (Landry, Francis)
|
|
Filing 2
Magistrate Consent Form issued. Summons were not provided and were not issued. (M,L)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number AOHNDC-10014810.. Filed by shawn liggons. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Copy of EEOC Charge against General Motors, LLC, #2 Exhibit B-Copy of Notice of Right to Sue, #3 Exhibit C-Copy of EEOC Charge against UAW Local 14, #4 Exhibit D-Copy of Notice of Right to Sue as to charge against UAW Local 14, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (Landry, Francis)
|
|
Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (M,L)
|
|
Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (M,L)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (M,L)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
