Provost v. Team Tobacco, Inc. et al
| Patricia Provost |
| Kyle Mio, Elias Sesi and Team Tobacco, Inc. |
| 3:2020cv01699 |
| July 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James G Carr |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Answer to #1 Complaint, with Affirmative Defenses filed by Kyle Mio, Elias Sesi, Team Tobacco, Inc.. (Dewhirst, Peter) |
| Filing 8 Return of Service by certified mail executed upon Elias Sesi on 8/12/2020, filed on behalf of Patricia Provost (Paoff, Kera) |
Order [non-document] granting Defendant's #6 Motion for extension of time until 9/16/2020 to answer to complaint. Judge James G. Carr on 8/26/2020. (D,TM)
|
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Team Tobacco, Inc.. (Dewhirst, Peter) |
| Notice by Clerk that Team Tobacco, Inc. failed to file a corporate disclosure statement as required by Local Rule 3.13(b). (R,Ke) |
| Filing 6 Motion for extension of time until 9/16/2020 to answer filed by Kyle Mio, Elias Sesi, Team Tobacco, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Dewhirst, Peter) |
| Filing 5 Attorney Appearance by Peter A. Dewhirst filed by on behalf of All Defendants. (Dewhirst, Peter) |
| Filing 4 Return of Service by certified mail executed upon Kyle Mio on 8/13/2020, filed on behalf of Patricia Provost (Paoff, Kera) Modified on 8/21/2020: Green card marked C-19. Delivered on 8/13/2020 at Front Desk/Reception/Mail Room per USPS website. (M,L). |
| Filing 3 Return of Service by certified mail executed upon Team Tobacco, Inc. on 8/5/2020, filed on behalf of Patricia Provost (Paoff, Kera) Modified text on 8/21/2020 (M,L). |
| Remark by Finance. Funds in the amount of $400.00 refunded on 08/13/2020 for receipt #AOHNDC-10148439. (K,Ve) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Kyle Mio, Elias Sesi, Team Tobacco, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (M,L) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Kyle Mio, ELIAS SESI, c/o Elias Sesi Team Tobacco, Inc.. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number AOHNDC-10148483.. Filed by Patricia Provost. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Paoff, Kera) |
| Request to Clerk for refund of erroneous or duplicate on-line filing fee payment. Reason for refund request: duplicate fee on complaint filing. Receipt #: AOHNDC-10148439, filed by Patricia Provost. (Paoff, Kera) |
| Judge James G. Carr assigned to case. (M,L) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (M,L) |
| Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (M,L) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
