Querin v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Sherry A. Querin
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 3:2020cv01760
Filed: August 10, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey J Helmick
Referring Judge: David A Ruiz
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Return of Service by U.S. Marshal by personal service through the U.S. Attorney executed upon Commissioner of Social Security on 8/13/2020; U.S. Attorney General and Office of the Regional Chief Counsel (signed c-19) on 8/17/20 by FedEx, filed on behalf of Sherry A. Querin. Related document(s) #5 . (L,Br)
August 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz on 8/12/2020. (G,CA)
August 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to U.S. Marshal for service upon Commissioner of Social Security (c/o the U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney General and Office of Regional Chief Counsel). (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (G,CA)
August 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz on 8/12/2020.(G,CA)
August 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (S,DM)
August 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (S,DM)
August 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz. (S,DM)
August 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 08/11/2020. (S,DM)
August 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Certificate of compliance with Order - Local Rule 9.1 filed by Sherry A. Querin. (Wicklund, Edward)
August 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Sherry A. Querin. (Wicklund, Edward)
August 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security.. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Sherry A. Querin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Letter to Clerk, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 Proposed Summons, #7 USM-285 Form, #8 USM-285 Form, #9 USM-285 Form) (Wicklund, Edward)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Querin v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Lisa Johnson
Represented By: Social Security Administration - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sherry A. Querin
Represented By: Edward A. Wicklund
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?