Betancourt v. Navarre Lodging, Inc.
Rudolph Betancourt |
Navarre Lodging, Inc. |
3:2020cv02329 |
October 13, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Jeffrey J Helmick |
James R Knepp |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12131 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case reassigned to District Judge James R. Knepp II pursuant to General Order 2020-26. (B,JL) |
Order [non-document] granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer: Navarre Lodging, Inc. answer due 1/15/2021.Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 12/1/2020.(S,AL) |
Filing 6 Attorney Appearance by Thomas P. Kemp filed by on behalf of Navarre Lodging, Inc.. (Kemp, Thomas) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Navarre Lodging, Inc.. (Pawlicki, Sarah) |
Filing 4 Motion for extension of time until January 15, 2021 to answer plaintiff's complaint filed by Defendant Navarre Lodging, Inc.. Related document(s) #1 . (Pawlicki, Sarah) |
Filing 3 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Navarre Lodging, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (R,Ke) |
Filing 2 Supplement to Complaint - Civil Cover Sheet, filed by Rudolph Betancourt. Related document(s) #1 . (Dunn, Owen) |
Filing 1 Complaint against Navarre Lodging, Inc.. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number AOHNDC-10338608.. Filed by Rudolph Betancourt. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Dunn, Owen) |
Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (R,Ke) |
Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (R,Ke) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (R,Ke) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Betancourt v. Navarre Lodging, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Rudolph Betancourt | |
Represented By: | Lawrence A. Fuller |
Represented By: | Owen B. Dunn, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Navarre Lodging, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Thomas P. Kemp |
Represented By: | Sarah E. Pawlicki |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.