Yarnell v. Board of Education of the Springfield Local School District, Lucas County, Ohio
| Charles R. Yarnell |
| Board of Education of the Springfield Local School District, Lucas County, Ohio doing business as Springfield Local Schools |
| 3:2020cv02420 |
| October 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jeffrey J Helmick |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2661 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Answer to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by Board of Education of the Springfield Local School District, Lucas County, Ohio. (Pizza, Lisa) |
| Filing 6 Attorney Appearance by Lisa E. Pizza filed by on behalf of Board of Education of the Springfield Local School District, Lucas County, Ohio. (Pizza, Lisa) |
| Filing 5 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Charles R. Yarnell. Board of Education of the Springfield Local School District, Lucas County, Ohio waiver sent on 10/26/2020, answer due 12/28/2020 filed on behalf of Charles R. Yarnell (Landry, Francis) |
Order [non-document] granting the plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Related Doc #2 ) Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 10/29/2020.(S,AL)
|
| Filing 4 Supplement to Complaint, - Civil Cover Sheet, filed by Charles R. Yarnell. Related document(s) #1 . (Landry, Francis) |
| Filing 3 Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons filed by Charles R Yarnell. (Landry, Francis) |
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Application Form AO239) filed by Plaintiff Charles R Yarnell. (Landry, Francis) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Board of Education of the Springfield Local School District, Lucas County, Ohio. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Charles R Yarnell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-copy of EEOC Charge, #2 Exhibit B-copy of Right to Sue) (Landry, Francis) |
| Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (M,L) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (M,L) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Yarnell v. Board of Education of the Springfield Local School District, Lucas County, Ohio | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Board of Education of the Springfield Local School District, Lucas County, Ohio doing business as Springfield Local Schools | |
| Represented By: | Lisa E. Pizza |
| Represented By: | Stephen D. Hartman |
| Represented By: | David M. Smigelski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Charles R. Yarnell | |
| Represented By: | Francis J. Landry |
| Represented By: | Katherine A. Pawlak |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
