Hephner v. Menard, Inc. et al
SEAN HEPHNER |
JOY (SURNAME UNKNOWN), JAKE (SURNAME UNKOWN), MENARD, INC., MENARDS DISTRIBUTION CENTER, Jake LNU and Joy LNU |
3:2020cv02511 |
November 6, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Jeffrey J Helmick |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Response to #7 Motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, Motion to Stay Proceedings and Compel Arbitration Brief In Opposition filed by Sean Hephner. (Pappert, Andrew) |
Filing 7 Motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, Motion to Stay Proceedings and Compel Arbitration with memorandum of law filed by Jake LNU, Joy LNU, Menard, Inc., Menards Distribution Center. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Employee / Employer Agreement)(Meyers, Alex). Motion added on 12/10/2020 (M,L). |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by All Defendants. (Meyers, Alex) |
Filing 5 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Jake LNU on 11/21/2020; Menards Distribution Center on 11/21/2020, filed on behalf of Sean Hephner. Related document(s) #2 . (R,Ke) |
Filing 4 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Menard, Inc. on 11/16/2020, and upon Menard, Inc. c/o Corporation Service Co. on 11/17/2020 filed on behalf of Sean Hephner. Related document(s) #2 , #1 . (S,DM) |
Filing 3 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Joy LNU on 11/16/2020, Signed and marked W.M. Rt 1 C-19 filed on behalf of Sean Hephner. Related document(s) #2 , #1 . (S,DM) |
Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Jake LNU (Receipt # 7020 1810 0002 2957 6521), Joy LNU (Receipt # 7020 1810 0002 2957 6538), Menard, Inc. (Receipt # 7020 1810 0002 2957 6491), Menard, Inc. c/o Corporation Services Co. (Receipt # 7020 1810 0002 2957 6507), Menards Distribution Center (Receipt # 7020 1810 0002 2957 6514) placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. (R,Ke) |
Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Jake LNU, Joy LNU, Menard, Inc. (also c/o Corporation Service Co.), Menards Distribution Center. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (M,L) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (M,L) |
Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (M,L) |
Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (M,L) |
Filing 1 Complaint for Damages and Reinstatement with jury demand against Menard, Inc., Menards Distribution Center, Jake LNU, Joy LNU. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number AOHNDC-10403582. Filed by Sean Hephner. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons x 5, #3 Exhibit Right to Sue) (Pappert, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.