Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Spartan Warehouse and Distribution Company Inc.
Norfolk Southern Railway Company |
Spartan Warehouse and Distribution Company Inc. |
3:2020cv02595 |
November 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Jeffrey J Helmick |
James R Knepp |
Commerce ICC Rates, Etc. |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 5 Notice of Dismissal Under FRCP 41(a)(1) (A)(i) with Prejudice filed by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Pitchford, Marshal) |
Case reassigned to District Judge James R. Knepp II pursuant to General Order 2020-26. (B,JL) |
Filing 4 Return of Service by personal service executed upon Spartan Warehouse and Distribution Company Inc. on 12/1/2020, filed on behalf of Norfolk Southern Railway Company Related document(s) #3 , #1 . (Pitchford, Marshal) |
Filing 3 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Spartan Warehouse and Distribution Company Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (R,Ke) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Norfolk Southern Corporation for Norfolk Southern Railway Company filed by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Pitchford, Marshal) |
Filing 1 Complaint against Spartan Warehouse and Distribution Company Inc.. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number AOHNDC-10431494.. Filed by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Pitchford, Marshal) |
Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (R,Ke) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (R,Ke) |
Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (R,Ke) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Spartan Warehouse and Distribution Company Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Spartan Warehouse and Distribution Company Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Norfolk Southern Railway Company | |
Represented By: | Marshal M. Pitchford |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.