Mitchell v. J. Schoen Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff: Laurence Mitchell
Defendant: J. Schoen Enterprises, Inc. doing business as Cleaner & Dryer Restoration & Construction
Case Number: 3:2020cv02772
Filed: December 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey J Helmick
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 621
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 10, 2021 Filing 6 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting - parties do not consent to this case being assigned to the magistrate judge, filed by Laurence Mitchell. (Landry, Francis)
February 2, 2021 Filing 5 Case Management Conference Scheduling Notice: case management conference to be held on 2/22/2021 at 02:30 PM to be held telephonically before Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick. (Attachments: #1 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting)(S,AL)
January 14, 2021 Filing 4 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Laurence Mitchell. J. Schoen Enterprises, Inc. waiver sent on 12/17/2020, answer due 2/15/2021 filed on behalf of Laurence Mitchell (Landry, Francis)
December 17, 2020 Filing 3 Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons filed by Laurence Mitchell. (Landry, Francis)
December 16, 2020 Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. Summons were not provided and were not issued. (M,L)
December 16, 2020 Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against J. Schoen Enterprises, Inc.. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-10501871.. Filed by Laurence Mitchell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Copy of EEOC Charge, #2 Exhibit B-Copy of Notice of Right to Sue, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Landry, Francis)
December 16, 2020 Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (M,L)
December 16, 2020 Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (M,L)
December 16, 2020 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke. (M,L)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mitchell v. J. Schoen Enterprises, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Schoen Enterprises, Inc. doing business as Cleaner & Dryer Restoration & Construction
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laurence Mitchell
Represented By: Francis J. Landry
Represented By: Katherine A. Pawlak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?