Fitts v. Shoop
Petitioner: Johnathon D. Fitts
Respondent: Warden Tim Shoop
Case Number: 3:2021cv00161
Filed: January 21, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Solomon Oliver
Referring Judge: David A Ruiz
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 17, 2021 Filing 9 Attorney Appearance by Daniel J. Benoit filed by on behalf of Tim Shoop. (Benoit, Daniel)
January 28, 2021 Filing 8 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Respondent to file an answer ("Return of Writ") to the petition within 60 days from the date of this order; Petitioner to file a reply by way of a Traverse within 30 days from the filing of Respondent's answer; Respondent shall have 15 days from the filing of Petitioner's Traverse to respond. Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz on 1/28/2021. (G,CA)
January 28, 2021 Copy of #8 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order mailed to Johnathon D. Fitts A753-529, Chillicothe Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 5500, 15802 State Route 104 North, Chillicothe, OH 45601; and to Warden Tim Shoop, Chillicothe Correctional Institution, 15802 State Route North 104, Chillicothe, OH 45601; and Copy of #4 Petition, #6 Order on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and #8 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order emailed to the Office of the Ohio Attorney General on 1/28/2021. (G,CA)
January 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order that this matter is referred for a report and recommendation decision to United States Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz, which referral shall include the issuance by the Magistrate Judge for any order requiring the respondent to answer, service of the petition or any appropriate order directed to the matter pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governing Habeas Corpus cases. LR 71.1(f). Signed by Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr. on 1/27/2021. (R,Sh)
January 27, 2021 Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr. on 1/27/2021. (R,Sh)
January 27, 2021 Copy of #5 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order, #7 Order, mailed to Johnathon D. Fitts A753-529 Chillicothe Correctional Institution P.O. Box 5500 15802 State Route 104 North Chillicothe, OH 45601 on 1/27/2021. Related document(s) #5 , #7 . (R,Sh)
January 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order granting Petitioner's #1 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz on 1/26/2021. (G,CA)
January 26, 2021 Copy of #6 Order on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis mailed to Johnathon D. Fitts A753-529, Chillicothe Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 5500, 15802 State Route 104, North Chillicothe, OH 45601; and to Tim Shoop WARDEN, Chillicothe Correctional Institution, 15802 State Route North 104, Chillicothe, OH 45601 on 1/26/2021. (G,CA)
January 21, 2021 Filing 5 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (M,L)
January 21, 2021 Filing 4 Petition under 28 USC 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in state custody. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Johnathon D. Fitts. Related document: #1 . (Attachments: #1 Supreme Court Documents, #2 Appellate Court Documents) (M,L)
January 21, 2021 Filing 3 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of Ohio Southern. Case number 2:21-cv-00157. Electronic file, transfer order and docket sheet received.
January 21, 2021 Copy of #5 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order and Docket Sheet mailed to Johnathon D. Fitts A753-529 at Chillicothe Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 5500, 15802 State Route 104 North, Chillicothe, OH 45601 on 1/21/2021. Related document(s) #5 . (M,L)
January 21, 2021 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz. (M,L)
January 21, 2021 Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr. assigned to case. (M,L)
January 20, 2021 Case transferred to District of Northern District of Ohio at Toledo. Case file and docket sheet sent Electronically. (jlk) [Transferred from ohsd on 1/21/2021.]
January 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER - This action is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States District Courtfor the Northern District of Ohio, in Toledo. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on January 19, 2021. (jlk)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) [Transferred from ohsd on 1/21/2021.]
January 15, 2021 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The following document(s) were not submitted to the Office of the Clerk: Summons and US Marshal Forms) by Petitioner Johnathon D. Fitts. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope) (daf) [Transferred from ohsd on 1/21/2021.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fitts v. Shoop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Tim Shoop
Represented By: Daniel J. Benoit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Johnathon D. Fitts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?