Toney v. Autoneum North America, Inc.
| Fredrick Toney |
| Autoneum North America, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv00435 |
| February 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James G Carr |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1002 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Joint Motion for extension of time until 5/26/21 to answer complaint filed by Defendant Autoneum North America, Inc.. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Pest, Michael) |
Order [non-document] granting #6 Joint Motion for extension of time to answer complaint. Autoneum North America, Inc., answer due 5/26/2021. Judge James G. Carr on 4/20/2021. (D,TM)
|
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Autoneum America Corporation, Corporate Parent Autoneum Holding AG for Autoneum North America, Inc. filed by Autoneum North America, Inc.. (Pest, Michael) |
| Filing 4 Attorney Appearance by Michael P. Pest filed by on behalf of Autoneum North America, Inc.. (Pest, Michael) |
| Filing 3 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Fredrick Toney. Autoneum North America, Inc. waiver sent on 2/24/2021, answer due 4/26/2021 filed on behalf of Fredrick Toney (Bryant, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. Service by waiver verified by counsel. (S,DM) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Autoneum North America, Inc.. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-10672069.. Filed by Fredrick Toney. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - NRTS 1.5.21, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bryant, Daniel) |
| Judge James G. Carr assigned to case. (S,DM) |
| Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (S,DM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Toney v. Autoneum North America, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Autoneum North America, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michael P. Pest |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Fredrick Toney | |
| Represented By: | Laren E. Knoll |
| Represented By: | Daniel I. Bryant |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
