White v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Timothy R. White |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 3:2021cv00762 |
| April 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Kathleen B Burke |
| James R Knepp |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (B,JL)
|
|
Filing 6
Magistrate Consent Package issued. (P,G)
|
|
Filing 5
Magistrate Judge's Initial Order: Defendant's Answer, the transcript of the administrative record and the parties' briefs shall be filed in accordance with Local Rule 16.3.1, including but not limited to the schedule set forth in that Rule. Any requests for an extension of time shall be filed at least five days prior to the due date for filing. Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke on 4/19/2021. (Attachments: #1 Local Rule 16.3.1)(P,G)
|
|
Filing 4
Order granting Plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke on 4/19/2021.(P,G)
|
|
Filing 3
Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 4/9/2021. (K,AR)
|
|
Filing 2
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Timothy R. White. (Dixon, Jay)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security Administration.. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Timothy R. White. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summonses, #3 Marshal Forms) (Dixon, Jay)
|
|
Judge James R. Knepp II assigned to case. (K,AR)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke. (K,AR)
|
|
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge James R. Knepp II on 4/9/2021. (K,AR)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: White v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Rema A. Ina |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration - Chicago |
| Represented By: | Rema Alberta Ina |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Timothy R. White | |
| Represented By: | Jay W. Dixon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
