Sutton v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections
| Pamela Sutton |
| Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections |
| 3:2021cv00962 |
| May 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James R Knepp |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Order [non-document] granting Defendant's #4 Motion for Extension of Time until 8/2/2021 to Answer. Defendant Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections answer now due 8/2/2021. Judge James R. Knepp II on 6/1/2021. (S,JM)
|
|
Filing 5
Attorney Appearance by James B. Yates filed by on behalf of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections. (Yates, James)
|
|
Filing 4
Unopposed Motion for extension of time until 08/02/2021 to answer Complaint filed by Defendant Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections. (Pawlicki, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 3
Proof of Service by certified mail executed upon Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections on 5/13/2021, filed on behalf of Pamela Sutton (Probst, Erica) Summons were not issued by Clerk Modified on 5/27/2021 (K,AR).
|
|
Filing 2
Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (K,AR)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint with jury demand against Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-10823502.. Filed by Pamela Sutton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Probst, Erica)
|
|
Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (K,AR)
|
|
Judge James R. Knepp II assigned to case. (K,AR)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sutton v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections | |
| Represented By: | James B. Yates |
| Represented By: | Sarah E. Pawlicki |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Pamela Sutton | |
| Represented By: | Erica A. Probst |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
