Roth v. Roppe Corporation
Plaintiff: Ronald Roth
Defendant: Roppe Corporation
Case Number: 3:2021cv01075
Filed: May 24, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: James R Knepp
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12131
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2021 Filing 6 Case Management Conference Scheduling Notice. Case Management Conference to be held telephonically on 8/26/2021 at 02:00 PM before Judge James R. Knepp II. The conference will convene on the Court's bridge line with dial-in access information to be provided to counsel in advance of the call. Judge James R. Knepp II on 7/27/2021. (Attachments: #1 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting) (S,JM)
July 23, 2021 Filing 5 Answer to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by Roppe Corporation. (Borgman, Adam)
June 11, 2021 Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Roppe Corporation placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: Certified mail. Receipt # 7019 1120 0001 5155 8075. (K,AR)
June 1, 2021 Filing 4 Attorney Appearance by Adam M. Borgman filed on behalf of Roppe Corporation. (Borgman, Adam)
June 1, 2021 Filing 3 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Roppe Corporation. Roppe Corporation waiver sent on 5/25/2021, answer due 7/26/2021 filed on behalf of Roppe Corporation (Borgman, Adam)
May 24, 2021 Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Roppe Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (K,AR)
May 24, 2021 Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-10849573. Filed by Ronald Roth. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit EEOC Right-to-Sue) (Wido, Christopher)
May 24, 2021 Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (K,AR)
May 24, 2021 Judge James R. Knepp II assigned to case. (K,AR)
May 24, 2021 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (K,AR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roth v. Roppe Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roppe Corporation
Represented By: Adam M. Borgman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Roth
Represented By: Samuel B. Robb
Represented By: Christopher P. Wido
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?