White v. Adient US, LLC
Plaintiff: Bryan White
Defendant: Adient US, LLC
Case Number: 3:2021cv01122
Filed: June 3, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey J Helmick
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 2661
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Order of Case Dismissal with prejudice. Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 9/20/2021. (S,AL)
September 15, 2021 Filing 10 Notice of Dismissal Under FRCP 41(a)(1) filed by Adient US, LLC. (Lewis, John)
September 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] The parties having indicated this case is settled, ordered that the case management conference scheduled for 10/25/2021 be vacated. Parties to file a dismissal entry in 30 days. re #9 Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 9/8/2021. (S,AL)
August 31, 2021 Filing 9 Joint Settlement Notice by all Parties filed by All Defendants. (Lewis, John)
August 17, 2021 Filing 8 Case Management Conference Scheduling Notice: case management conference to be held on 10/25/2021 at 3:00 PM to be held telephonically before Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick. (Attachments: #1 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting)(S,AL)
August 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting #7 the defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer until 10/4/21. re #7 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 8/4/2021.(S,AL)
August 3, 2021 Filing 7 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until October 4, 2021 to answer Complaint filed by Defendant Adient US, LLC. Related document(s) #1 . (Lewis, John)
July 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting #6 the defendant's second and unopposed motion for Extension of Time to Answer. re #6 Answer due August 4, 2021. Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 7/23/2021.(S,AL)
July 20, 2021 Filing 6 Unopposed Second Motion for extension of time until August 4, 2021 to File Responsive Pleading filed by Defendant Adient US, LLC. Related document(s) #1 . (Lewis, John)
July 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting the defendant's motion for an extension of time until 7/21/2021 to respond to the complaint. #5 Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 7/13/2021.(S,AL)
July 7, 2021 Filing 5 Motion for extension of time until July 21, 2021 to file responsive pleading filed by Defendant Adient US, LLC. Related document(s) #1 . (Lewis, John)
June 25, 2021 Filing 4 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Adient US, LLC on 6/16/2021, no delivery date on green card, date obtained from U.S. Postal Service website, filed on behalf of Bryan White Related document(s) #2 . (H,JL)
June 16, 2021 Filing 3 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Adient US, LLC, no delivery date on green card, Out for delivery according to U.S. Postal Service website, filed on behalf of Bryan White Related document(s) #2 . (H,JL)
June 7, 2021 Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Adient US, LLC placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: Certified mail. Receipt # 7019 1120 0001 5155 7634. and Adient US LLC c/o CT Corporation System placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: Certified mail. Receipt # 7019 1120 0001 5155 7627. (K,AR)
June 4, 2021 Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Defendant Adient US, LLC and statutory agent. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (M,L)
June 4, 2021 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (M,L)
June 4, 2021 Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (M,L)
June 4, 2021 Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (M,L)
June 3, 2021 Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand For Damages and Reinstatement against Adient US, LLC. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-10866992. Filed by Bryan White. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons X2) (Bean, Frederick)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: White v. Adient US, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Adient US, LLC
Represented By: John B. Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bryan White
Represented By: Frederick M. Bean
Represented By: Taurean J. Shattuck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?