Arega v. U.S. Attorney General et al
| Tizazu Fekadu Arega |
| U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement |
| 3:2021cv01480 |
| July 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| John R Adams |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Tizazu Fekadu Arega. Related document(s) #1 . (S,DM) |
| Filing 1 Petition under 28 USC 2241 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in federal custody. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Tizazu Fekadu Arega. (Attachments: #1 Memo and Affidavit, #2 Exhibit A - In Removal Proceedings, #3 Exhibit B - Additional Charges of Inadmissibility/Deportability, #4 Order, #5 Envelope) (S,DM) |
| Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without the filing of a Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a). Copy of #1 Petition and blank Civil Cover Sheet mailed to Tizazu Fekadu Arega at 3040 South State Route 100, Tiffin, Ohio 44883 on 8/2/2021. Related document(s) #1 . (S,DM) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (S,DM) |
| Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (S,DM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
