Wright v. Bowerman, et al
| Demarco Wright |
| Sean Bowerman, Captain Jones, Christian Aumiller, C.O. Snowburger and John Does |
| 3:2021cv01498 |
| August 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jeffrey J Helmick |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
Order: Plaintiff to pay filing fee or complete and submit the Financial Application within 30 days. re #2 . Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay on 9/22/2021. (Attachments: #1 Financial Application)(R,Ke)
|
|
Copy of #3 Order and a financial application mailed to Demarco Wright Toledo Correctional Institution 2001 East Central Avenue Toledo, OH 43608 on 9/22/2021. Related document(s) #3 . (R,Ke)
|
|
Filing 2
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Demarco Wright. (M,MT)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Demarco Wright. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Mailing, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 USM-285, #5 Envelope) (M,MT)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (M,MT)
|
|
Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (M,MT)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
