Schwan v. Visiting Nursing Hospice and Health Care
| Kelly Schwan |
| Visiting Nursing Hospice and Health Care |
| 3:2021cv01571 |
| August 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James R Knepp |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2661 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Visiting Nursing Hospice and Health Care. (Roth, Meghan) |
| Filing 5 Defendant's Answer to #1 Complaint, filed by Visiting Nursing Hospice and Health Care. (Roth, Meghan) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Substitution of Counsel removing attorney Sean Costello and adding attorney Christopher P. Wido filed by on behalf of Kelly Schwan. (Wido, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Kelly Schwan. Visiting Nursing Hospice and Health Care waiver sent on 8/13/2021, answer due 10/12/2021 filed on behalf of Kelly Schwan (Costello, Sean) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Visiting Nursing Hospice and Health Care (x2- as to Defendant and Registered Agent). (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (M,L) Modified text on 8/13/2021 (M,L). |
| Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (M,L) |
| Judge James R. Knepp II assigned to case. (M,L) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (M,L) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Visiting Nursing Hospice and Health Care. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-10981154. Filed by Kelly Schwan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons x2) (Costello, Sean) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Schwan v. Visiting Nursing Hospice and Health Care | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kelly Schwan | |
| Represented By: | Sean P. Costello |
| Represented By: | Christopher P. Wido |
| Represented By: | Trisha M. Breedlove |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Visiting Nursing Hospice and Health Care | |
| Represented By: | Meghan Anderson Roth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
