Evans v. NOX U.S., LLC
| Eugene Evans |
| NOX U.S., LLC |
| 3:2021cv01647 |
| August 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James R Knepp |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 623 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Defendant's Answer to #1 Complaint filed by NOX U.S., LLC. (Bowes, Robert) |
Order [non-document] granting Defendant's #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, Move or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, answer due 10/22/2021. Judge James R. Knepp II on 9/21/2021. (K,AR)
|
| Filing 4 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until 10/22/21 to answer Complaint filed by Defendant NOX U.S., LLC. Related document(s) #1 . (Bowes, Robert) |
| Filing 3 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail, unsigned marked C-19, executed upon NOX U.S., LLC on 9/1/2021, no delivery date on green card, date obtained from U.S. Postal Service website, filed on behalf of Eugene Evans Related document(s) #2 . (H,JL) |
| Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to NOX U.S., LLC placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: Certified Mail. Receipt # 7019 0700 0001 8423 9883. (K,AR) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon NOX U.S., LLC. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (M,L) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against NOX U.S., LLC. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-10998066.. Filed by Eugene Evans. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Exhibit Right to Sue) (Robb, Samuel) |
| Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (M,L) |
| Judge James R. Knepp II assigned to case. (M,L) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (M,L) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Evans v. NOX U.S., LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Eugene Evans | |
| Represented By: | Daniel S. Dubow |
| Represented By: | Samuel B. Robb |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: NOX U.S., LLC | |
| Represented By: | Robert J. Bowes, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
