Dachnowski v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, et al.
Joanne Dachnowski |
Costco Wholesale Corporation and John Doe |
3:2021cv01650 |
August 24, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
James G Carr |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Notice of Service of Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories, Request for Production of Documents and Requests for Admissions directed to the Defendant filed by Joanne Dachnowski. (Swiech, Jeffrey) |
Filing 8 Notice of Service of Plaintiff's Responses to Defendant's Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents filed by Joanne Dachnowski. (Swiech, Jeffrey) |
Order: [non-document] Due to a court scheduling conflict, the Status Conference set for 1/4/2022 is vacated to be reset for 1/10/2022 at 09:00 AM to be held by video conference (Toledo) before Judge James G. Carr. Video conference access information to be provided to all participants in advance of conference. Status Report due by 12/31/2021. Judge James G. Carr on 10/21/2021. (D,TM) |
Filing 7 Initial Disclosures filed by Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Fogarty, Dennis) |
Filing 6 Initial Disclosures filed by Joanne Dachnowski. (Swiech, Jeffrey) |
Minute Order: [non-document] Telephonic Initial Status/Scheduling Conference in lieu of case management conference held on 9/7/2021 before Judge James G. Car. Time: 10 Minutes. Plaintiff appeared by attorney Jeffrey W. Swiech. Defendant appeared by attorney Dennis R. Fogarty. Parties advised as to case status. Rule 26 Disclosures due 10/1/2021. Track designated as: STANDARD. Parties to complete Initial Discovery by 12/31/2021. Further Status Conference set for 1/4/2022 at 9:00 AM by video conference. Video conference access information to be provided to all participants three (3) days in advance of hearing. Parties to submit Joint Status Reports on or before 12/23/2021. Judge James G. Carr on 9/7/2021. (D,TM) |
Filing 5 Notice of Service of Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Plaintiff filed by Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Fogarty, Dennis) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Fogarty, Dennis) |
Notice [non-document] of Initial Status/Scheduling Conference set for 9/7/2021 at 10:30 AM to be held telephonically before Judge James G. Carr. Counsel to call the Court's conference line at (877) 336-1839, access code 8856866. (SG,D) |
Filing 3 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (M,L) |
Judge James G. Carr assigned to case. (M,L) |
Notice by Clerk that Costco Wholesale Corporation failed to file a corporate disclosure statement as required by Local Rule 3.13(b). (M,L) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (M,L) |
Filing 2 Supplement to Notice of Removal, - Civil Cover Sheet, filed by Costco Wholesale Corporation. Related document(s) #1 . (Fogarty, Dennis) |
Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Wood County Common Pleas, case number 2021CV0299 with jury demand, Filing fee paid $ 402, receipt number AOHNDC-10998992.. Filed by Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Exhibit Summons, #3 Exhibit Docket from Wood County CPC, #4 Exhibit Costco's Answer) (Fogarty, Dennis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.