Hall v. Ford Motor Company
| TREMAIN HALL |
| FORD MOTOR COMPANY |
| 3:2021cv01814 |
| September 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James G Carr |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Stipulated Order of Case Dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party shall bear their own attorneys fees and costs. Related Document #15 . Judge James G. Carr on 11/29/2022. (D,TM) |
| Filing 15 Proposed Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice filed by Ford Motor Company. (Linville, Ronald) |
| Filing 14 Joint Status Report Requesting Thirty-Day Continuance filed by Ford Motor Company. (Linville, Ronald) |
Order: [non-document] The parties indicate in the #14 joint status report that additional time is needed to submit a stipulated dismissal entry. Stipulated Dismissal Entry due 11/30/2022. Judge James G. Carr on 10/31/2022. (D,TM)
|
|
Order: [non-document] Counsel notifies the court that the parties have settled. Stipulated Dismissal or Status Report due on or before 10/31/2022. Settlement Conference set for 10/4/2022 vacated. Judge James G. Carr on 9/27/2022. (D,TM)
|
|
Order: [non-document] Due to a court scheduling conflict, the Settlement Conference set for 8/24/2022 will be vacated to be reset for 10/4/2022 at 01:30 PM to be held by video conference (Toledo) before Judge James G. Carr. Video conference zoom invite to issue to all participants in advance. Judge James G. Carr on 8/1/2022. (D,TM)
|
|
Order: [non-document] Settlement Conference vacated for 7/14/2022 and reset for 8/24/2022 at 02:00 PM to be held by video conference (Toledo) before Judge James G. Carr. Video conference zoom invite to issue to all participants in advance of conference. The parties and/or authorized representatives who appear for the conference must have full authority to settle the case. Each party must file a brief, double-spaced ex parte narrative statement via cm/ecf no later than ten (10) days prior to the conference (8/12/2022). Judge James G. Carr on 6/9/2022. (D,TM)
|
|
Order [non-document] granting the Unopposed Motion to continue the Settlement Conference of 7/8/2022 (Related Doc #13 ). Settlement Conference set for 7/14/2022 at 02:00 PM to be held by video conference (Toledo) before Judge James G. Carr. Video conference zoom invite to issue to all participants in advance of conference. Judge James G. Carr on 6/2/2022. (D,TM)
|
| Filing 13 Unopposed Motion to continue Settlement Conference filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Linville, Ronald) |
| Filing 12 Protective Order regarding confidential documents. Related Document #11 . Judge James G. Carr on 5/27/2022. (D,TM) |
| Filing 11 Proposed Stipulated Protective Order filed by Ford Motor Company. (Linville, Ronald) Modified text on 5/26/2022 (D,TM). |
| Minute Order: [non-document] Video Status/scheduling conference on #10 unopposed motion to reschedule held on 4/18/2022 before Judge James G. Carr. Time: 10 minutes. Plaintiff appeared by attorney Christopher P. Wido. Defendant appeared by attorneys Ronald Linville and Lauren Larrick. Parties advised as to case status. Initial Settlement Conference rescheduled for 7/8/2022 at 9:00 AM by video conference (Toledo) before Judge James G. Carr. Video conference zoom invite to issue to all participants in advance. Plaintiff's good faith demand shall be made not later than three weeks before the Settlement Conference. Defendant shall make a good faith response not later than two weeks before the Settlement Conference. Counsel and the parties, or in the case of an organizational party, a partys authorized representative must attend the conference. The parties and/or authorized representatives who appear for the conference must have full authority to settle the case. Each party must file a brief, double-spaced ex parte narrative statement via cm/ecf (Event to use for filing: Civil Events-Other documents- Ex parte Filing (other than motion)) no later than ten (10) days prior to the conference. Judge James G. Carr on 4/18/2022. (D,TM) |
|
Order: [non-document] Status Conference re motion to reschedule settlement conference set for 4/18/2022 at 09:00 AM to be held by video conference (Toledo) before Judge James G. Carr. Video zoom invite to issue to all participants in advance of conference. Judge James G. Carr on 3/30/2022. (D,TM)
|
| Filing 10 Unopposed Motion to continue the Initial Settlement Conference set for April 25, 2022 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Linville, Ronald) |
| Filing 9 Attorney Appearance by Lauren M. Larrick filed by on behalf of Ford Motor Company. (Larrick, Lauren) |
| Minute Order: [non-document] Video Initial Status/scheduling conference held on 1/11/2022 before Judge James G. Carr. Time: 15 minutes. Plaintiff appeared by attorney Christopher P. Wido. Defendant appeared by attorneys Ronald Linville and Lauren Larrick. Parties advised as to case status. Case designated track: STANDARD. Rule 26 Disclosures due 1/25/2022. Discovery deadline 10/31/2022; Dispositive Motions due 12/1/2022; Response/Opposition 1/10/2023; Reply due 2/1/2023. Initial Settlement Conference set for 4/25/2022 at 1:30 PM by video zoom before Judge James G. Carr. Plaintiff's good faith demand shall be made not later than three weeks before the Settlement Conference. Defendant shall make a good faith response not later than two weeks before the Settlement Conference. Counsel and the parties, or in the case of an organizational party, a partys authorized representative must attend the conference. The parties and/or authorized representatives who appear for the conference must have full authority to settle the case. Each party must file a brief, double-spaced ex parte narrative statement via cm/ecf no later than ten (10) days prior to the conference. If case does not settle, a Status Conference to be set for 10/17/2022 at 9:00 AM by video conference before Judge James G. Carr. Video conference zoom information to be provided to all participants in advance of conference. Judge James G. Carr on 1/11/2022.(D,TM) |
| Filing 8 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting - filed by All Plaintiffs. (Wido, Christopher) |
| Notice [non-document] of Initial Status Scheduling Conference set for 1/11/2022 at 09:30 AM to be held by video conference (Toledo) before Judge James G. Carr. Video conference information to be provided to all participants in advance of conference. (D,TM) |
| Filing 7 Answer to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Ford Motor Company. (Linville, Ronald) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Order for Second Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Move or Plead in Response to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Ford Motor Company. (Linville, Ronald) |
| Filing 5 Second Motion for extension of time until December 29, 2021 to to move or plead in response to Plaintiff Tremain Hall's Complaint filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Linville, Ronald) |
|
Order [non-document] granting #5 Second Motion for extension of time until 12/29/2021 to move or plead in response to Plaintiff's Complaint as unopposed. Judge James G. Carr on 11/29/2021. (D,TM)
|
| Filing 4 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until November 29, 2021 to answer in Response to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Linville, Ronald) |
|
Order [non-document] granting #4 Unopposed Motion for extension of time to move or plead in response Plaintiffs Complaint. Ford Motor Company answer due 11/29/2021. Judge James G. Carr on 10/29/2021. (D,TM)
|
| Filing 3 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Ford Motor Company on 10/18/2021, no delivery date on green card, date obtained from U.S. Postal Service website, filed on behalf of Tremain Hall (K,AR) |
| Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Ford Motor Company placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: Certified mail. Receipt # 7019 0700 0001 8309 0379. (K,AR) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (S,DM) |
| Judge James G. Carr assigned to case. (S,DM) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (S,DM) |
| Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (S,DM) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11049983.. Filed by TREMAIN HALL. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Wido, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hall v. Ford Motor Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: TREMAIN HALL | |
| Represented By: | Christopher P. Wido |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FORD MOTOR COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | Ronald G. Linville |
| Represented By: | Lauren M. Larrick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
