Durden v. Postmaster General of the United States et al
| Denea Durden |
| Postmaster General of the United States and United States Postal Service |
| 3:2021cv01890 |
| October 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jack Zouhary |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2661 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon United States Postal Service on 11/10/2021 filed on behalf of Denea Durden Related document(s) #5 . (H,JL) |
| Filing 8 Return of Service by Clerk by Certified Mail executed upon Attorney General of the United States U.S. Department of Justice on 10/26/21 filed on behalf of Denea Durden (K,AR) |
| Filing 7 Return of Service by Clerk by Certified Mail executed upon Postmaster General United States Postal Service on 10/26/2021 filed on behalf of Denea Durden (K,AR) |
| Filing 6 Return of Service by Clerk by Certified Mail executed upon Office of the United States Attorney signed C-19 on 10/22/21 filed on behalf of Denea Durden (K,AR) |
| Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Postmaster General of the United States (Receipt # 70201290000135193067), United States Postal Service (Receipt # 70201290000135193180), Attorney General of the United States (Receipt # 70190700000193322606), Office of the United States Attorney (Receipt #70190700000193322613) placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. (H,JL) |
| Filing 5 Original Summons issued to counsel for service upon Postmaster General of the United States, United States Postal Service. (K,AR) |
| Filing 4 First Praecipe for issuance of Original Summons filed by Denea Durden. (Attachments: #1 Summons Postmaster General DeJoy, #2 Summons US AG ND OH, #3 Summons US AG DC, #4 Summons USPS)(Thompson, Tod) |
| Filing 3 Civil Case Management Procedures Order. Judge Jack Zouhary on 10/5/2021. (H,JL) |
| Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. No Summons issued. None Provided. (H,JL) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11068711.. Filed by Denea Durden. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Thompson, Tod) |
| Judge Jack Zouhary assigned to case. (H,JL) |
| Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a).After Defendant(s) have been served and counsel enter an appearance, this Court will promptly hold an Initial Phone Status Conference. No Motion to Dismiss may be filed in advance of this Conference. The responsive pleading deadline will be automatically tolled until that time. (H,JL) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (H,JL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
