Pollitt v. Cushman & Wakefield of Ohio, Inc.
DERRICK POLLITT |
CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD OF OHIO, INC. |
3:2021cv01969 |
October 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Jeffrey J Helmick |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Answer to #1 Complaint, filed by Cushman & Wakefield Of Ohio, Inc.. (McKenzie, John) |
Filing 9 Return of Service by Clerk unexecuted upon Cushman & Wakefield of Ohio, Inc. Service attempted by Certified Mail on 11/5/2021. Return to Sender, Refused, Unable to Forward filed on behalf of Derrick Pollitt. Related document(s) #2 . (R,EM) |
Filing 8 FILING ERROR Returned Mail addressed to Party Cushman & Wakefield of Ohio, Inc. Return to Sender. Refused. Unable to Forward. Related document(s) #2 . (R,EM) Modified on 11/30/2021 (R,EM). |
Order [non-document] granting Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Kimberly A. Ross for Cushman & Wakefield Of Ohio, Inc.. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. (Related Doc #7 ). Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 11/22/2021.(S,AL) |
Order [non-document] granting #6 the defendant's motion for Extension of Time until 12/17/2021 to Answer. re #6 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 11/22/2021.(S,AL) |
Filing 7 Motion for attorney Kimberly A. Ross to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-11142287, filed by Defendant Cushman & Wakefield Of Ohio, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing for Kimberly A. Ross)(McKenzie, John) |
Filing 6 Motion for extension of time until December 17, 2021 to answer complaint filed by Defendant Cushman & Wakefield Of Ohio, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint)(McKenzie, John) R). |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Cushman & Wakefield, Plc for Cushman & Wakefield Of Ohio, Inc. filed by Cushman & Wakefield Of Ohio, Inc.. (McKenzie, John) |
Filing 4 Attorney Appearance by John W. McKenzie filed by on behalf of Cushman & Wakefield Of Ohio, Inc.. (McKenzie, John) |
Filing 3 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Cushman & Wakefield of Ohio, Inc. on 11/5/2021, filed on behalf of Derrick Pollitt. Related document(s) #2 . (R,EM) |
Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Cushman & Wakefield Of Ohio, Inc. placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: Certified mail. Receipt # 7019 1120 0002 0300 5434 and Cushman & Wakefield Of Ohio, Inc. c/o CT Corporation System placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: Certified mail. Receipt # 7019 0700 0001 8309 0362. (K,AR) |
Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Cushman & Wakefield Of Ohio, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (K,AR) |
Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (H,JL) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (H,JL) |
Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (K,AR) |
Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11088879.. Filed by DERRICK POLLITT. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Right to Sue) (Bean, Frederick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pollitt v. Cushman & Wakefield of Ohio, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: DERRICK POLLITT | |
Represented By: | Frederick M. Bean |
Represented By: | David E. Byrnes |
Represented By: | Taurean J. Shattuck |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD OF OHIO, INC. | |
Represented By: | John W. McKenzie |
Represented By: | Kimberly A. Ross |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.